Security Systems Government Contracts in Massachusetts

In Q2 2026, Massachusetts has 14 active Security Systems Services opportunities distributed across 4 cities, but the market is top-heavy: Unknown commands 50% of all activity. Unknown, Hanscom AFB, Buzzards Bay together hold 93% of statewide deal flow. Contractors entering Massachusetts's Security Systems Services market should treat Unknown as the primary beachhead before expanding to secondary markets.

In Massachusetts's Security Systems Services sector, Unknown dominates with 7 active opportunities (50% of state volume) in Q2 2026, followed by Hanscom AFB at 5 and Buzzards Bay at 1. The relatively close race between top cities indicates a competitive market where ranking shifts are common as new solicitations post. Contractors should track how these rankings evolve seasonally, as federal fiscal year-end (September) often reshuffles city-level activity.

The buying landscape for Security Systems Services in Massachusetts centers on Department of Veterans Affairs (35%), Department of State (22%), Department of the Air Force (19%), spanning 100 total contract actions worth $12.0M. Department of Veterans Affairs's 35% market share makes it the priority target, but the remaining 4 agencies provide enough alternative deal flow to support a multi-agency pursuit strategy. On the vendor side, the market is incumbent-heavy: the top 3 contractors — AES CORPORATION, JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY SOLUTIONS LLC, BAY STATE ALARM SECURITY, INC — hold 78% of recent awards, meaning new entrants face significant barriers unless targeting recompetes or set-asides.

Looking ahead, 3 Security Systems Services contracts in Massachusetts are entering recompete windows, valued at an estimated $128.4M combined. Of these, 3 carry high takeover signals — meaning the incumbent's position is vulnerable based on the agency's historical vendor switching patterns. For contractors planning their Massachusetts pipeline, these recompetes represent the highest-probability wins: existing requirements with defined scopes, incumbent performance data on record, and established funding lines.

Analysis computed from SAM.gov and USAspending.gov data · Updated daily

Computed from SAM.gov and USAspending.gov data · Updated daily